<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/1.5.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Junk Mail - just how &#8220;heavy&#8221; a problem is it?</title>
	<link>http://www.fippy.net/blog/archives/2006/02/junk-mail-just-how-heavy-a-problem-is-it/</link>
	<description>Ramblings of a little Blue Gnoll</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 10 Sep 2010 03:19:04 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=1.5.2</generator>

	<item>
 		<title>Comment on Junk Mail - just how &#8220;heavy&#8221; a problem is it? by: Fippy</title>
		<link>http://www.fippy.net/blog/archives/2006/02/junk-mail-just-how-heavy-a-problem-is-it/#comment-12</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Feb 2006 05:08:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.fippy.net/blog/archives/2006/02/junk-mail-just-how-heavy-a-problem-is-it/#comment-12</guid>
					<description>Wow! That was some scarey research Joel. Thanks for that. This is a serious problem that I am very surprised no one is bringing to the nation's attention. Animal charities are everywhere but where are the tree-hugger ones? As a society we really need to rethink the way we market our products and services. Junk mail, whether material or electronic is far too primitive.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Wow! That was some scarey research Joel. Thanks for that. This is a serious problem that I am very surprised no one is bringing to the nation&#8217;s attention. Animal charities are everywhere but where are the tree-hugger ones? As a society we really need to rethink the way we market our products and services. Junk mail, whether material or electronic is far too primitive.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
 		<title>Comment on Junk Mail - just how &#8220;heavy&#8221; a problem is it? by: Joel Jennings</title>
		<link>http://www.fippy.net/blog/archives/2006/02/junk-mail-just-how-heavy-a-problem-is-it/#comment-11</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Feb 2006 17:15:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.fippy.net/blog/archives/2006/02/junk-mail-just-how-heavy-a-problem-is-it/#comment-11</guid>
					<description>This is what conservatree.com says &quot;based on a mixture of softwoods and hardwoods 40 feet tall and 6-8 inches in diameter, it would take a rough average of 24 trees to produce a ton of printing and writing paper.&quot;  So...according your findings...9 million tons of junk mail a year, respresents about 216 million trees used just for junk mail.  Yikes!  According to the USFS, a very dense, mature (20 years - 8 inch diameter - 58 feet tall) pine plantation in the southeast has a density of 520 trees/acre.  So...(216 million trees)/(520 trees/acre) = (roughly) 415,385 acres.  Double yikes!! The state of Rhode Island consists of approximately 668,800 acres (1045 square miles); every year we cut down about 2/3 the state of Rhode Island in trees just for junk mail?  Triple yikes!!!

(This is an extremely rough estimate based on a VERY dense tree plantation.  The *real* number of acres is likely higher.  Also, some of this mail likely contains some % of &quot;post-consumer fibers&quot; i.e. recycled paper.  Whatever percent that is (30 maybe?) we can reduce the final number by that amount.  Still...yikes.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>This is what conservatree.com says &#8220;based on a mixture of softwoods and hardwoods 40 feet tall and 6-8 inches in diameter, it would take a rough average of 24 trees to produce a ton of printing and writing paper.&#8221;  So&#8230;according your findings&#8230;9 million tons of junk mail a year, respresents about 216 million trees used just for junk mail.  Yikes!  According to the USFS, a very dense, mature (20 years - 8 inch diameter - 58 feet tall) pine plantation in the southeast has a density of 520 trees/acre.  So&#8230;(216 million trees)/(520 trees/acre) = (roughly) 415,385 acres.  Double yikes!! The state of Rhode Island consists of approximately 668,800 acres (1045 square miles); every year we cut down about 2/3 the state of Rhode Island in trees just for junk mail?  Triple yikes!!!</p>
	<p>(This is an extremely rough estimate based on a VERY dense tree plantation.  The *real* number of acres is likely higher.  Also, some of this mail likely contains some % of &#8220;post-consumer fibers&#8221; i.e. recycled paper.  Whatever percent that is (30 maybe?) we can reduce the final number by that amount.  Still&#8230;yikes.)
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
